The controversy of clinical versus actuarial

Results from resent research in New York. The experimenter has programmed so that the red light will flash 70 percent of the time and the blue light 30 percent of the time The anticipated medical benefits of stem cell research add urgency to the debates, which has been appealed to by proponents of embryonic stem cell research.

I also agree with Holt that we should still value clinical judgment although it is not as accurate.

Further work by Alexander Maximow and Leroy Stevens introduced the concept that stem cells are pluripotent. Therefore, it can be concluded that CERAP shares features of unreliability with the consensus-based models evaluated by Baird et al.

Embryonic stem cells make up a significant proportion of a developing embryo, while adult stem cells exist as minor populations within a mature individual e.

Mitigating circumstances are conditions that reduce the chances for abuse or neglect and family strengths reflect the psychological or relational resources a family can draw upon for support. The problem is that they do not understand that if they give up on trying to predict correctly on every trial, they can actually be more accurate.

This paper will link the latest research on risk assessment practices to the legal controversy over the use of safety plans within DCFS and will conclude with recommendations for public policy and social work practice.

This discretion can lead to abuses of power in the worst cases. Local Cells, Global Science: Department of Health and Human Services So, what does the research conclude about risk assessment validity? It would be wasteful not to continue to make use of these cell lines as a resource.

Embryos used in medical research for stem cells are well below development that would enable viability.

Striking a Better Balance between Child Safety and Parental Rights

The need for comprehensive risk management systems in child welfare. The crux of this ethical concern lies on the belief that each individual is so unique that rigid statistics or equations cannot make the correct prediction in every single case.

Actuarial models are not meant to replace clinical judgment altogether, but provide a structure for decision-making that counteracts cognitive errors and biases inherent in clinical judgment Dawes If you do not, the state may seek to take protective custody of your children.

While extracting and cloning stem cells is complex and extremely expensive, the newly discovered method of reprogramming cells is much cheaper.

Alternatives[ edit ] This argument is used by opponents of embryonic destruction, as well as researchers specializing in adult stem cell research. Embryos are not equivalent to human life while they are still incapable of surviving outside the womb i.

Social work and power.

Stem cell controversy

Decision points in child welfare:Paul E. Meehl's work on the clinical versus statistical prediction controversy is reviewed. His contributions included the following: putting the controversy center stage in applied psychology; clarifying concepts underpinning the debate (especially his crucial distinction between ways of gathering.

Clinical versus actuarial risk assessment in child protective services: Results from resent research in New York. Paper presented at the 11 th Annual CPS Roundtable on Risk Assessment, San Francisco.

The controversy of clinical versus actuarial judgement is not limited to the field of psychology; it also affects education in terms of predicting school performance, criminal justice system in terms of parole board decisions and business in terms of personnel selection. These two alternatives created a controversy concerning clinical and actuarial prediction.

This controversy has been in existence for almost 70 years. During this time hundreds of articles have. The controversy of clinical versus actuarial judgment is not limited to the field of psychology; it also affects education in terms of predicting school performance, criminal justice system in terms of parole board decisions and business in terms of personnel selection.

Paul E. Meehl's work on the clinical versus statistical prediction controversy is reviewed.

The Controversy of Clinical Versus Actuarial Prediction Paper

His contributions included the following: putting the controversy center stage in applied psychology; clarifying concepts underpinning the debate (especially his crucial distinction between ways of gathering data and ways of combining them) as well as establishing that the controversy was real and not.

Download
The controversy of clinical versus actuarial
Rated 3/5 based on 90 review